New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points: Energizing Earth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Existing technology can derive enough energy from renewable sources to meet the world's needs several times over, according to a Worldwatch Institute report released in January. (For an assessment of the practical aspects, see “The Power of Renewables,” by Matthew L. Wald, on page 56.) The report also summarizes the fourth assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the policies needed to survive a warmer world.

Trillions of kilowatt-hours of global energy used annually: 132.5

Years this amount would power a U.S. home: 13 billion


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Trillions of kilowatt-hours of energy that can, in principle, be harvested with current technology:

Solar: 444

Wind: 167

Geothermal: 139

Biomass: 69

Percent of global energy used:

By buildings: 40

For electricity generation: 41

Percent of global energy generated from renewable sources, including hydropower: 20

Fraction of energy wasted as heat during electricity generation: 2/3

SOURCE: State of the World, 2009

Scientific American Magazine Vol 300 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Energizing Earth” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 3 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0309-24a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe