Engineered Bacteria Produce a Rainbow of Colors

By inserting some genes and knocking down others, scientists solved a core problem in synthetic biology

Rainbow colored worm coming out of a paint tube.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have modified a common bacterium to spit out an entire rainbow of dyes for food, clothing, cosmetics, and more. The proof-of-concept research also detailed the natural production of two colors—green and navy blue—for the first time.

Some dyes can be produced naturally from plants. Indigo, for example, is extracted from leaves of species in the genus Indigofera. But the task is labor-intensive, with variable results. Synthetic alternatives can involve toxic precursors and by-products, sometimes released as pollutants. And consumers are willing to pay more for natural colorants, says Sang Yup Lee, a chemical and biomolecular engineer at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. So he and his colleagues set out to engineer Escherichia coli to make seven natural hues.

The researchers not only had to tweak the microbes by adding specific genes to produce the dyes, they also had to help the bacteria push the colors out into the world. Because the involved dyes are hydrophobic (water-repellent), they typically cannot pass through bacterial cell membranes; they would instead accumulate inside the cell and ultimately kill it. Synthetic biology researchers seeking to produce self-sustaining “cell factories” for chemicals have long been stymied by this problem.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lee and his team genetically altered their E. coli, first to grow longer cells and then to convert some of the extra membrane surface area into sacs that could encircle and expel the accumulated chemicals. Rather than cutting out the relevant genes entirely, which might in some instances kill the bacteria, they introduced small RNA sequences that “silenced” such undesired but essential genes. They also inserted a human gene that caused the bacteria to form microscopic pouches on their membranes for even greater surface area. The complete process is described in Advanced Science.

Lee says that his E. coli production method has no toxic properties and could be incorporated into industry today—but that “some colors will be more expensive because the [concentrations] are still quite low and difficult to produce.”

The new technique could eventually help engineer microbes to produce hydrophobic antibiotics, says Duke University biochemist Meta Kuehn, who was not involved in the research. This capability “would be tremendous as far as a good source for producing some really difficult-to-synthesize antibiotics,” she says.

Lee has worked on metabolic engineering for 26 years and describes these rainbow food and clothing dyes as his latest forays into industrial chemical production—which have also included making compounds involved in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. It's a running joke among his colleagues, he adds with a smile, that his goal is to produce every compound in the chemists' go-to Sigma-Aldrich catalog.

Maddie Bender is a science writer and a producer at Hawaii Public Radio. She was a 2021 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Scientific American.

More by Maddie Bender
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Living Color” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 3 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0921-21a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe