New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Enormous Sunshield Tested for Space Telescope

Northrop Grumman/Alex Evers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For car owners, manipulating the folds and creases of those unwieldy sunshades that spread underneath hot windshields can be tricky. But for NASA, unfolding a shade the size of a tennis court 1.6 million kilometers away in space is astronomically more complicated. Seven engineers and six technicians at Northrop Grumman in Redondo Beach, Calif., conducted a three-day test of the giant sunshield that will protect NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope once it is irretrievably flung into orbit. The team spent 20 hours in July unfolding and separating the shield’s five test layers for the first time to simulate how it will unfurl in space.
 
The apparatus—made of hair-thin membrane layers composed of a strong, lightweight plastic that is coated with a reflective metal—will act as a giant umbrella. It will partition the observatory into a warm sun-facing side, which can reach a sweltering 200 degrees Celsius, and a cold, dark side. The device will shield the telescope’s sensitive instruments with a whopping sun protection factor (SPF) of 1,000,000.
 
This and other tests will confirm that the shade is working properly and alert scientists to any issues. To compensate for the gravity during the test—which will not be present in orbit—the team rested the shield on beams to support the shield’s weight. On launch the giant shade will be wrapped around the Webb telescope’s mirrors and instruments. Once the package has reached orbit it will unfold as programmed. The observatory is set to launch in October 2018.
 
—Julia Calderone

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe