New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Environmental Group Sues EPA for Revoking Mercury Protection Rule

The lawsuit accuses the agency of illegally withdrawing a rule that reduces the discharge of mercury from dental offices

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As U.S. President Donald Trump takes aim at what he considers an excess of federal regulations, a new lawsuit accuses the Environmental Protection Agency of illegally rescinding a rule to reduce the discharge of mercury from dental offices, mere hours after Trump took office.

In a complaint filed on Wednesday, the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council said the final rule was withdrawn on Jan. 20, the date of Trump's inauguration, after White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus directed federal agencies to “immediately withdraw” final rules slated for publication.

But the NRDC said the mercury rule could not be withdrawn before its expected Jan. 24 publication in the Federal Register because it was subject to a Clean Water Act provision that, given the wording of Priebus' memorandum, forbade withdrawal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As a result, the EPA had no authority to rescind the rule without first getting public comment, according to the NRDC, an environmental advocacy group. Its lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court seeks to undo the rule's rescission.

“The Trump administration, and President Trump himself, have made it seem like it will be easy to wipe away environmental protections for the American people,” David Goldston, director of government affairs for the NRDC, said in an interview. “We view this rule as one that is final, and which can be rescinded only through the full rulemaking process.”

An EPA spokeswoman had no immediate comment.

Mercury discharged into the environment can damage people's health, including through seafood consumption.

Dentists nonetheless can use mercury safely in amalgams for fillings.

The EPA rule would have reduced discharges by dental offices of mercury and other metals into municipal sewage treatment plants by more than 10 tons annually.

It would also have required dentists to adopt “best management” practices recommended by the American Dental Association. (here)

On Monday, Trump issued an executive order requiring many federal agencies to eliminate two regulations for each new regulation introduced. Trump is not a defendant in the NRDC lawsuit.

The case is Natural Resources Defense Council v EPA et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 17-00751.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Andrew Hay)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe