New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Erosion May Transform the Arctic Food Chain

Scientists have discovered an unexpected consequence of the shifting polar landscape

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As climate change continues to grip the Arctic—causing the oceans to rise, permafrost to thaw and sea ice to melt—scientists believe they've discovered an unexpected consequence of the shifting landscape. Changes along the coastline are altering the composition of the Arctic Ocean, in ways that could fundamentally transform the local food chain.

A new study published yesterday in the journal Science Advances suggests that there's been an increase in the amount of soils or sediments flowing from the Arctic shore into the ocean over the last decade. And the researchers say climate change is likely to blame. As Arctic sea ice continues to melt, it's exposing the shallow regions around the coast to more wind and wave action, causing the waters to churn and draw sediments up from the continental shelf into the water column.

These sediments have likely carried an influx of carbon and other nutrients with them, which—if the pattern continues—could fuel an increase in plankton and algae in the water. And because plankton are a major food source for small fish and other marine organisms, the shift could cause a major change in the numbers and types of animals that populate the region.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's hard to say how these changes might affect the Arctic ecosystem as a whole, said Matthew Charette, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and one of the study's authors. There could be both positive and negative effects.

"You take away ice, you take away potential habitats for polar bears," he noted. "But then that may in turn lead to increases in fish stocks, for example, if you have increases at the base of the food chain."

The researchers—scientists from Woods Hole, the University of South Carolina and the University of Washington—came to their conclusions by measuring radium isotopes in the Arctic waters. Radium is a chemical element found in soils and sediments, including in permafrost, in riverbeds and on the continental shelf around the Arctic shoreline. It dissolves easily in seawater, making it a reliable indicator of any increases or decreases in the amount of sediment flowing into the water over time.

The researchers compared two data sets of radium measurements—one collected by another research group in 2007, and one that they collected themselves in 2015. They found that there was a significant increase in radium from the first data set to the second. As a result, the researchers can infer that there's been an increase in the amount of sediment—along with the carbon and nutrients it also contains—into the ocean.

The spike in radium-containing sediments could potentially have come from a variety of sources, the scientists noted. But the balance between the different isotopes, or chemical forms, of radium they've measured so far seems to suggest that the recent increase is mainly coming from the continental shelf, likely thanks to reductions in sea ice. But in the future, other climate effects—such as thawing permafrost—could release more sediments from other sources into the sea.

As a result, the scientists believe the pattern they've observed so far may continue as the Arctic goes on warming. But the only way to be sure is to continue monitoring different parts of the Arctic coastline.

"The most extensive data that we have was just for those two data points, and it's hard to make a projection based on drawing a line between two sets of data," Charette pointed out. "If you consider the 2007 data as a kind of a baseline, and then what we got in 2015—if we can add to that, we can better predict which direction things might be heading."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe