Estrogen Blues

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Over their lifetimes, women are twice as likely to suffer clinical depression than men. Low or imbalanced hormone levels can prompt depression in either sex, and insufficient estrogen in women has long been suspected. Now a comprehensive review of 30 years of research indicates that the trouble may not be low estrogen levels per se but sharp variations in those levels.

Estrogen balances often change significantly during puberty and menopause, as well as during a woman’s monthly reproductive cycle. In each circumstance, when the level shifts, a woman may experience a greater chance of depression, says Stephanie L. Douma, a researcher with Natural Resources Canada in Ottawa, who conducted the work independently. Details will be published in the February 2006 issue of Advances in Nursing Science.

Douma says women who are experiencing mood problems and the doctors who may treat them may not be thinking about the fluctuation scenarios and therefore may not be stabilizing estrogen at optimum levels.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study also has implications for hormone replacement therapy, which many women undergo during or after menopause. For example, women may take hormone pills only every third day to counter a higher potential risk for breast cancer that might be linked to too much medication. But that protocol means the hormone level never stabilizes, Douma says.

Douma hopes that the findings will prompt more investigations into best practices for regulating estrogen and that doctors will more routinely monitor their patients’ levels. These measures, she says, will help keep estrogen-associated depression at bay.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe