Europe Launches $41-Million Project to Map Human Epigenome

DNA-modification studies get a multi-million euro boost.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Alison Abbott of Nature magazine

The health-research division of the European Commission launches its largest-ever project next week with a €30-million (US$41-million) investment in understanding the human epigenome, the constellation of DNA modifications that shape how genes are expressed.

With the project, called BLUEPRINT, Europe intends to become a major player in the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC), set up last year to help biologists understand how the epigenome influences health and disease.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All the cells that make up an individual originate from the same fertilized egg and share the same genome. But during development, cells acquire epigenetic changes -- such as chemical modifications to DNA, and changes in the shape of its tightly coiled three-dimensional structure -- that affect which genes will be active in which cells at a given time and which will be silent.

The epigenome then remains largely stable, so that a liver, for example, remains a liver throughout life. But small parts of the epigenome change constantly as the cell responds to environmental changes. The epigenome also changes in diseases, including cancer.

The importance of the epigenome in health and disease is becoming increasingly clear. But researchers studying it have faced a big hurdle: the lack of a reliable library of high-quality, quantitative reference epigenomes against which new data can be compared. Little is known, even, about how much the epigenome normally varies between individuals, or between the different cells in an individual.

Enter BLUEPRINT, which unites 41 institutions and more than 50 principal investigators across Europe who will contribute a further €10 million to the project. BLUEPRINT will provide at least 100 reference epigenomes toward the IHEC's goal of amassing 1,000 reference epigenomes by 2020.

BLUEPRINT has chosen to focus on the blood system. This should help move discoveries quickly into the clinic, as many diagnostic tests rely on blood samples. "Blood is also what gets stored in biobanks and used for genome analysis," says BLUEPRINT coordinator Henk Stunnenberg at the Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences in the Netherlands.

Beyond these conveniences, there was also a compelling biological rationale for the choice, he says. Unlike most tissues, blood cells are constantly renewed, so blood comprises a mix of cells at different stages of maturity. "Blood-cell epigenomes may reveal some general rules about how cells develop," Stunnenberg says.

BLUEPRINT will generate reference epigenomes from 60 different cell types, taken from the blood of healthy individuals stored in the UK's national blood bank. Each epigenome will include a full genome sequence, and genome-wide quantitative data on the occurrence and distribution of nine different epigenetic markers.

For comparison with healthy epigenomes, the consortium will produce reference epigenomes for more than 60 blood-cancer cell types. It will carry out experiments in mice to work out how much of the epigenome is heritable. The consortium also plans to generate lower-resolution epigenomes from two blood-cell types from 100 healthy people to provide a first quantitative indication of natural individual variation.

"BLUEPRINT is the first big epigenome project to be specifically created in alignment with the IHEC mission," says Peter Jones at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, who helped to launch the IHEC. "Blood epigenomes are particularly exciting because we know an awful lot about the biology of how blood stem cells differentiate, but little about the sequence of epigenomic events involved in the processes that are going to be relevant for disease."

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on September 28, 2011.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe