Europe Nears First Approval for Gene Therapy Treatment

China was the first country to approve a gene therapy product for commercial use, in 2004. The U.S. has yet to endorse any such treatments and the field has been plagued by carcinogenicity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

From Nature magazine

Europe’s drugs regulator has for the first time recommended a gene therapy medicine for approval.

Glybera, a treatment for patients who cannot produce enough of an enzyme crucial for breaking down fat, was backed by the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). This recommendation has to be endorsed by the European Commission before it becomes available, but it would be unusual for the Commission to reject the recommendation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gene therapy involves transferring genes into patients to treat their diseases. In this case Glybera uses a virus injected into a patient to deliver a working copy of a gene for producing lipoprotein lipase (LPL). LPL deficiency affect no more than one or two people in a million.

Back in 2004 China became the first country to approve a gene therapy product for commercial use, with a treatment for cancer. But Europe and the United States have yet to endorse any gene therapy treatments and the field has been plagued by issues such as carcinogenicity.

Jörn Aldag, chief executive of uniQure, the Amsterdam-based company that owns Glybera, says today’s announcement from the EMA is an “overdue signal” to the gene therapy community that things are changing. “It unlocks the potential,” he told Nature. “You will see more investment coming.”

‘Fantastic news’
Tim Coté, former head of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Orphan Products Development and now an independent consultant, says the approval is "astounding, fantastic news. It puts Europe at the forefront.”

Glybera had previously received negative opinions from both the CHMP and the EMA Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), which advises on cutting edge treatments. However, after re-evaluating the treatment in just those patients who experience severe or multiple attacks of pancreatitis as a result of LPL deficiency, the CAT gave a positive opinion in June, and this has now been endorsed by the CHMP.

Tomas Salmonson, acting chairman of the CHMP, said in a statement that the “established ways” of assessing the risks and benefits of Glybera had been challenged by the rarity of the condition and uncertainties in the data.

“The evaluation of this application has been a very complex process, but the use of Glybera in a more restricted indication than initially applied for, which targets the patient population with greatest need for treatment, and additional analyses by the [CAT] have added to the robustness of the data provided and allowed the CHMP to conclude that the benefits of Glybera are greater than its known risks,” he said.

The CHMP recommendation was eventually given only under an ‘exceptional circumstances’ designation. This allows a treatment to be approved in the absence of large scale clinical trials, and is used for therapies targeting diseases that affect only small numbers of patients where large-scale trials are near impossible. Glybera has been tested on 27 patients in three studies. UniQure will have to set up a registry to monitor what happens to patients taking the treatment, which will be reviewed by the EMA.

Hot on Glybera’s heels is another gene therapy treatment which targets the immunodeficiency disorder ADA-SCID. However this is an ‘ex-vivo’ treatment which involves performing gene therapy on a patient’s extracted bone marrow cells and then injecting them back into the patient.

Now being supported by London-based drug giant GlaxoSmithKline, this treatment is just behind Glybera in the approval process, says molecular biologist Fulvio Mavilio, scientific director of the French biotechnology institute Genethon and one of those working on the treatment.

“These two examples of products in the two flavours in which gene therapy is available today – ex-vivo and in-vivo – made it to the final stage, which is great news for the entire field,” he says.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on July 20, 2012.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe