New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Evolution Education Gets Bad Grades

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image:Kate Wong; Source: Nature

Less than a month into the school year, bad grades are already being given out. According to a new study, more than one third of U.S. states deserve D's and F's when it comes to teaching children about evolution (see chart). These unacceptable standards, Lawrence S. Lerner wrote in a summary of the report in the journal Nature, "seriously damage or even erase the possibility of teaching science to young people as more than a confusing collection of facts."

Lerner, emeritus professor of astronomy and physics at California State University, graded each state based on the extent to which it succumbed to creationist pressures and resorted to so-called "anti-evolution tactics," such as avoiding the word evolution or omitting discussions that imply an old Earth existed. His results are disheartening. With regard to biological evolution, for example, three states have eliminated it from their curricula altogether. And even among the 31 states that have satisfactory-to-excellent treatments of the topic, he reports, only nine present human evolution explicitly.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although biological evolution tends to garner the most public attention, approaches to teaching the evolution of the earth and of the universe are affected as well. Indeed, as Lerner notes in Nature, "Given the far-reaching ramifications of evolution in the life sciences as well as in other sciences, a complete and proper exposition of evolution is an essential constituent of state science standards." Lerner will present the report at a symposium tomorrow in Washington, D.C., and it will be made available online at http://www.edexcellence.net.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe