Evolution Education Gets Bad Grades

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image:Kate Wong; Source: Nature

Less than a month into the school year, bad grades are already being given out. According to a new study, more than one third of U.S. states deserve D's and F's when it comes to teaching children about evolution (see chart). These unacceptable standards, Lawrence S. Lerner wrote in a summary of the report in the journal Nature, "seriously damage or even erase the possibility of teaching science to young people as more than a confusing collection of facts."

Lerner, emeritus professor of astronomy and physics at California State University, graded each state based on the extent to which it succumbed to creationist pressures and resorted to so-called "anti-evolution tactics," such as avoiding the word evolution or omitting discussions that imply an old Earth existed. His results are disheartening. With regard to biological evolution, for example, three states have eliminated it from their curricula altogether. And even among the 31 states that have satisfactory-to-excellent treatments of the topic, he reports, only nine present human evolution explicitly.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although biological evolution tends to garner the most public attention, approaches to teaching the evolution of the earth and of the universe are affected as well. Indeed, as Lerner notes in Nature, "Given the far-reaching ramifications of evolution in the life sciences as well as in other sciences, a complete and proper exposition of evolution is an essential constituent of state science standards." Lerner will present the report at a symposium tomorrow in Washington, D.C., and it will be made available online at http://www.edexcellence.net.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe