New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Excessive TV-Watching During Adolescence May Lead to Violent Behavior in Adulthood

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Children's television reportedly contains up to 25 acts of violence in a single hour--content that may have serious behavioral ramifications on its young viewers, researchers report. According to a study published in the current issue of the journal Science, adolescents who watch more than one hour of television a day are more likely to engage in violent or aggressive acts later in life. This link was strongest for boys, but dedicated adolescent viewers of both sexes were more likely to act aggressively toward others in their late teens or early twenties than those who abstained or watched very little television. Additionally, the researchers uncovered an apparently direct correlation between the amount of time spent glued to the entertaining screen and the likelihood of subsequent misbehavior.

Jeffrey Johnson of Columbia University and colleagues conducted a series of interviews with a group of more than 700 children and their parents over a period of 17 years beginning in 1975, when the kids were 10 years old or younger. The team gathered data on both the television viewing habits and behavior of the subjects as they aged. Interviews aimed at evaluating aggression continued through the year 2000, when the researchers also consulted state and federal records for instances of criminal behavior. Even after adjusting for factors such as parental education, psychiatric conditions and safety of the subject's neighborhood, the link between television exposure and aggressive behavior held up. Indeed, 22.5 percent of adolescents who watched between one and three hours of television a day committed aggressive acts later in life, compared with 5.7 percent among those who spent less than one hour in front of the tube. For the individuals who watched more than three hours, the number jumped to 28.8 percent. As for the nature of their violent actions, boys most often engaged in assaults or fighting; aggressive acts amongst young women included robbery and harmful threats.

"Our findings suggest that, at least during early adolescence, responsible parents should avoid permitting their children to watch more than one hour of television a day," Johnson says. He also took care to note that scientists suspect a range of ill-effects from over-exposure to television in young people, including greater chances of obesity.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe