New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Expectations Influence Sense of Taste

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tastebuds alone do not determine what something tastes like. Researchers have demonstrated that expectation, too, plays a role.

Previous research in primates had suggested that expectation had little effect on how taste registers in the brain. Neuroscientist Jack Nitschke and his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin lined up 30 college-age volunteers to see whether the same holds true for humans.

The neuroscience team prepared five drinks containing water mixed with varying amounts of quinine or sugar and paired them with five symbols: water with a strong concentration of quinine was linked to a minus sign; water with a milder concentration got a crossed-out minus sign; simple distilled water received a zero; and water with either a mild or strong concentration of sugar got the plus sign equivalents of their negative counterparts. After three trial runs, the students had learned the associations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers then loaded the subjects into an fMRI machine for the next round of tastings. This time, however, they mixed the signs and drinks. For example, the crossed-out minus sign--initially paired with the milder quinine mixture--sometimes preceded the bitterest drink during the eight tastings in the machine.

When the participants were shown a sign indicating that the bitter drink was going to be less bitter, the same regions of the brain that fired when the subjects believed they were going to taste the bitterest drink still fired, but they did so less strongly. The subjects also reported that the drink tasted less bitter to them. The same influence of expectation on taste perception was evident when the subjects received the sugared water.

"These data show that neural responses to taste in the primary taste cortex are modulated by expectations and not solely by the objective quality of taste," the researchers write in a paper published online today by Nature Neuroscience. In other words, taste is partly in your mind.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe