New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Expensive Sneakers May Twist Ankles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Those expensive sneakers you thought would cushion your feet may actually be bad for your ankles, according to a new study published in today's British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study conducted by researchers from three Australian universities found that players wearing sneakers with air cells in the heels were more than four times more likely to get ankle injuries while playing basketball. To figure this out, the scientists watched an awful lot of basketball games, sitting courtside waiting for players to hurt themselves. They then asked injured players, as well as unharmed ones, to answer questions in follow-up phone interviews. In all, they observed 10,393 people play (3,421 men, 6,972 women)¿77.9 percent of whom were recreational players. Forty people hurt their ankles, almost half of them while landing after a jump.

It turned out that a history of ankle injuries made players almost five times more likely to be injured again. And in fact, almost three quarters of those injured had been injured before, whereas only 32 percent of the unharmed players had been injured before. But wearing sneakers with air cells came in as the second leading predictor for suffering an injury: Players with air cell sneaker were 4.3 times more likely to get hurt than those wearing shoes without air cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So does this mean you shouldn¿t wear sneakers with air cells if you've injured your ankles in the past? There may be more to it than that, but these findings could be helpful in formulating strategies to prevent ankle injuries in basketball in the future.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe