New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What is the weight ratio of CO2 released to fuel burned?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Full question: In several recent articles, reference was made to the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) released from burning some quantity of fuel. It seemed that the tons of CO2 exceeded the weight of the fuel. What is the ratio of CO2 released to fuel burned by weight?

Susan Trumbore, professor in and chair of the earth system science department at the University of California, Irvine, calculates an answer to this question.

This seems like a question about conversion of mass to moles. (A mole is a unit of measurement to quantify the amount of a substance made up of atoms, where one mole is equal to 6.02 x 1023 units of that substance; 6.02 x 1023 is a chemical constant known as Avogadro's number.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When considering fuel, let's take the example of gasoline. One of the primary components of gasoline is octane, which is made up of molecules that have eight carbon atoms and 18 hydrogen atoms. The weight of one mole of octane molecules will be equal to the summation of the weights of eight carbon atoms (at 12 grams/mole each, from carbon's mass number) plus 18 hydrogen atoms (at 1 gram/mole each). So, doing the math (8 x 12 + 1 x 18), we see that octane weighs 114 grams/mole.

If you combusted all of the octane to carbon dioxide, each of the eight carbon atoms would become part of a CO2 molecule. Thus, you would have eight CO2 molecules per octane molecule burned--or eight moles of CO2 per mole of octane burned. The weight of CO2 is 44 grams per mole (1 x 12 grams/mole for the carbon and 2 x 16 grams/mole for the oxygen atoms). Burning one mole of octane (114 grams), therefore, would produce eight moles of CO2, with a weight of 352 grams (8 x 44).

Thus, the weight ratio of CO2 produced per octane molecule burned is 352/114, or roughly 3 to 1.

Actual weight ratios will of course vary, since gasoline is not purely octane. In general, however, when you burn carbon fuels they are in "reduced" form, that is, the carbons in the molecules are attached mostly to hydrogen atoms. When they are burned, the carbon becomes "oxidized" (literally, combined with oxygen) to make CO2. Since oxygen is far heavier than hydrogen, the product is heavier than what is burned.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe