New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Relative to the solar system, where is the Oort cloud? And what is its size and shape?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Paul Weissman, lead scientist at the Table Mountain Observatory, part of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, offers the following answer.

The Oort cloud is a huge spherical cloud of some 1012 comets surrounding the solar system and extending halfway to the nearest stars. We believe that the Oort cloud comets originated as icy planetesimals between the orbits of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, and were dynamically ejected to their current distant orbits by gravitational interactions with those giant planets.

The ejection process scatters the comets not only to large orbits but also to moderately large inclinations, on the order of 20 or 30 degrees. Once in the Oort cloud, gravitational perturbations from random passing stars, from encounters with giant molecular clouds in the galaxy, and from the galactic tide continue to modify the cometary orbits. Because these perturbations occur when the comets are close to aphelion (the farthest point from the sun) in their very eccentric orbits, they are most effective at changing the angular momentum of the orbit. The angular momentum figures most importantly in determining the perihelion distance of the comet (the point at which it is nearest to the sun) and its orbital inclination. As a result, the perihelia of the comets tend to diffuse away from the planetary region and the inclinations of the orbits continue to grow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As an example, a comet with a perihelion distance of about 10 astronomical units (AU), near the orbit of Saturn, and an aphelion distance of 50,000 AU, typical for the Oort cloud, moves at a velocity of only 2.7 meters per second at aphelion. A one-solar-mass star passing at a distance of 1 parsec (206,265 AU) at a velocity of 30 kilometers per second will perturb the velocity of the comet by about 0.29 meter per second. That is enough to raise the perihelion distance to 12.3 AU or to increase the orbital inclination by about six degrees. Because a comet will receive on the order of 40,000 such perturbations over its lifetime, it is easy to see how the inclinations and perihelion distances of the orbits can be completely randomized. The result is a spherical Oort cloud.

Answer originally posted March 4, 2002

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe