Explaining a Mass Extinction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nearly 34 million years ago, shellfish the world over perished in the largest mass extinction since the one that claimed the dinosaurs. Along the U.S. Gulf Coast, for example, almost 90 percent of the mollusks were wiped out--to be replaced later by new species of their ilk. The cause of this fatal event, however, has remained somewhat of a mystery. Until now. The results of a study published this week in the journal Nature suggest that a colder climate was the culprit.

Researchers had suspected that temperature changes might have played a role in the extinction that took place at what geologists call the Eocene/Oligocene boundary, but they didn't have any proof. "Mean annual temperature records for the Gulf Coast that exist for that time period don't show any change," notes co-author Linda C. Ivany of Syracuse University, "but they don't tell you about seasonal variations in temperature."

In order to investigate those variations, Ivany and her colleagues turned their attention to fossilized ear stones, known as otoliths, from fish that survived the mass extinction. These tiny calcium carbonate bodies form part of the hearing and balance system in most bony fish. New material accumulates on an otolith in a series of growth rings, accruing relatively more of a particular form of oxygen when the water is cooler. Scientists can thus read the rings to determine the seasonal temperature conditions that existed during the fish's lifetime. In so doing, the team found that whereas summer temperatures remained the same, winter temperatures dropped by as much as four degrees Celsius.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"This is the first time anyone has looked at seasonality as a variable for an extinction event across a geological time boundary," says team member William Patterson. "Existing records weren't able to resolve the change because the records are based on summertime growth. The fish survived the drop in winter temperatures and left a permanent record, while the mollusks didn't make it." Ivany has plans to investigate the seasonal temperature variations that existed in the North Sea and on Antarctica's Seymour Island during that same period.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe