Explaining Shaking Grains

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: F. ROUYER/University of Massachusetts

How granular material behaves--shifting and sifting and sliding around in miniature avalanches--may not seem like the most fascinating subject, but it is of vital importance in the real world: understanding such mechanics helps physicists model how grains move in silos, how soils collapse in earthquakes, and how certain materials and food products mix. And researchers from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst have now come up with an elegant way of describing grains that are shaken, drawing a direct analogy to the century-old kinetic theory of gases. Narayanan Menon and Florence Rouyer describe their work in the October 23 issue of the Physical Review Letters.

In an ideal gas, the individual molecules are at equilibrium with their environment; when one hits the wall of its container, energy is exchanged. As a result, it is possible by way of kinetic theory to derive, based only on the average temerature of the gas, a distribution of all the velocities of the molecules. Because grains that are shaken are not at equilibrium--they absorb energy in the form of heat by way of interparticle collisions caused by the shaking--it wasn't clear that a kinetic-type theory might apply, Menon explained.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even so, he and Rouyer measured the velocities of steel beads, 1.6 millimeters in diameter, in an enclosed space shaken vertically at speeds up to 1.8 meters per second. A high-speed video camera captured the motions (shown above) over a period of 5.5 milliseconds. They found that the probability of the horizontal velocities fell neatly into a bell-shaped distribution--not identical to, but not unlike the Gaussian curve of kinetic theory. This distribution remained the same when they changed the rate and amount of shaking, the density of the particles and the shape of the container. But its width varied with the average speed of a particle--the granular equivalent of temperature in gases. It is a preliminary result at the moment, but just perhaps a fundamental theory of grains is in the making.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe