Explosion of a Blast Pipe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS—You inquire, in a late number of the " Scientific American," " what was the cause of the bursting of the blast pipe of the Crane Iron Works, Pa. V I will endeavor to answer. I am not aware of the circumstances of the explosion, but I believe you will find the cause as I shall describe it. If I am correct, the explosion was not caused by the blast, nor while the blast was in operation, but in putting#n the blast, just as a boiler explodes when putting on the pumps. The cause of the explosion was gas from the furnace, the pipe having become filled with it while the blast was gff. When the blast is put on, the gas is forced back into the furnace or rather explodes on the first turn of the cur-rent to the furnace instead of from it, as it was before the blast was applied. You will observe that the draught, as I have stated, is, in the first place, from the furnace, sometimes caused bv the wind blowing down the chimney ; sometimes I have noticed quite a strong natural draught into the pipe. The tuyeres are placed low, near the bottom ot the furnace, a reason why the gases have not been more consumed when entering the pipe. Furnaces ought all to have an opening of about two or three inches in diameter, and at the end of the bend, where the pipes ascend or descend from the tuyeres, with a slide or cover, which should always be open when the blast is not on the furnace, this causes a draft into the furnace, arid prevents any from it. As we are on explosions, I ask the scientific world,—" did you ever see our foundry-men pouring melted iron into a pailful of water to warm it in winter, often causing a steam explosion on a small scale ; here is a pail of water without any power, into which you can pour melted iron to a certain extent in perfect safety, but the instant this is exceeded the pail is dashed into a hundred pieces without any warning whatever; where is the utility of safety valves, false alarms, c, for this kind of explosion, when the top of an open pail won't do? pour yaaf water from engine pumps on red-hot inland the same result ensues. I have often ssfen roes ai e mom or less in this way ; a little experience, however, soon teaches a man how far to go with safety. Troy,N. Y., 1853. J. T. [The following is. another letter on the same subject:— " The blast-pipe which exploded, as mentioned in the " Scientific American," must have been charged {by stopping the blast) with di-carburet of hydrogen, formed by the distillation of coal in the furnace. It being nearly one half as light as air, would find its way into the pipe, and as it (C.HS) requires only about two volumes of oxygen, or a little more to render it highly explosive, when they started the blast it passed off like thnhcler. Salem, Mass., April, 1853. E. L. N."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 31This article was published with the title “Explosion of a Blast Pipe” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 31 (), p. 243
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04161853-243

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe