Explosion of an Air Chest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have received from one of our correspondents—S. M. Parsons, of Waukan, Wis.— the account of a peculiar explosion of an air chest which took place a few weeks ago at the Vermilion Blast Furnace of that place. Dr. Tilden, one of the proprietors, informed him that the furnace and hearth were of the common form with one tweer, using charcoal for fuel with hot blast smelting a mixture of bog aud other iron ore. The furnace had run over thirty days, and was stopped half an hour to draw off the metal. The instant it was started again, the air chest exploded with a most violent report, and doing considerable damage. It was situated one hundred feet from the furnace between two cylinder bellows, with which it was connected by swing valves. The pipe connecting it with the furnace passed back and forth under the boilers where it leaked a little ah-, and the tweer also leaked some water at its mouth. Various cases of explosions are on record as having been caused by leaky tweers, and in all likelihood this was the cause of this explosion. Water falling upon red-hot charcoal, or iron will be decomposed, and the liy-drogen gas set free. In this case, water from the tweer may have been decomposed, and the hydrogen may have passed into the leaky air-pipe, thence into the air chest, and mixed with the oxygen of the air, thus forming a violently explosive compound gas easily ignited by the most minutu spark.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 27This article was published with the title “Explosion of an Air Chest” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 27 (), p. 213
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03131858-213d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe