Extraction of Copper from Ore

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lewis H. Parrish and R. M. Roberts, have secured a patent in England for improvements in the separation and extraction of copper from its ores. The object sought is the chemical treatment of copper ores, so as to obtain a greater per centage of pure copper from the ore, and also to render available refuse ore. The ore, if large, is broken up into lumps of about two or three inches cube. These are then placed in a furnace, calcined, and kept at a dull red heat. After being sufficiently roasted, the ore is withdrawn from the kiln through a trap underneath, and instantly passed through two pairs of ordinary crushers, the first pair of which will reduce it into small lumps, and the second will pulverize it. While still hot it is next plunged into an acid bath made of lead or slabs of slate, to stand heat. This tank is placed inside an iron tank containing water, and fire is applied to the bottom of the water tank ; the solution is to be kept within a few degrees of boiling point. The ore muBt be kept frequently stirred. When the solution has taken up all the copper, it should be drawn off through a filter into a second tank, containing iron to precipitate the copper. The tank is to be kept warm by a low heat under the bottom. When the whole of the copper has been precipitated, the solution may be carefully drawn off into another vessel, and is then ready to be rinsed after adding fresh acid. The precipitate left in the tank is then thoroughly cleansed with water, laid upon a drying stove, thoroughly dried, and is then ready for melting.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 36This article was published with the title “Extraction of Copper from Ore” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 36 (), p. 284
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05151858-284b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe