Extraction of Gold from Dross

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is a singular fact that notwithstanding the large number of able mechanics that have emigrated to California, to engage in the development and extraction of its golden wealth, but few of them have produced any important inventions to assist their labors. Those who have had experience in gold digging have represented to us that miners have found great difficulties for the want of some process, by machinery or otherwise, in extracting the gold from the extraneous substances with which it is intermingled. In consequence of the neglect of inventors and mechanics to pro-Tide some quick means for the accomplish- i ment of this object, particularly in the ex- I tracting of the gold from the heavy black sand or iron oxyd with which it is found, a ' large amount of the combined mass is thrown ] aside as a refuse substance, although known to be rich with the precious metal. The Sacramento Union, in a late article on this subject, notices a method of extracting gold from what is termed as the " tailings" of the quartz mills, invented by a Frenchman named J. B. Chavelier, at present residing in Sacramento. These "tailings" are the sulphates, chiefly of iron, which, after pulverizing, are rejected in the amalgamating process, and thrown out generally as worthless by the miners. He found them to contain from fifty to one hundred cents of gold to the ounoe of sulphate, and succeeded in bringing his machine to such perfection as to enable him to work over a tun of the quartz waste per day, from which is yielded an average of $100 per tun—one thousand dollars being sometimes extracted from this material, which costs only thirty dollars in its almost refuse state. In addition to the sulphates, a considerable amount of mint and assay ashes are subjected to the searching process. But a larger business still is done in the black sand procured either directly from the miners' camps, or from the bankers, who obtain it in cleansing the dust they purchase. These "blowings," as they are denominated, are sometimes very rich, yelding as much as $210 upon fifty-seven ounces of sand. The use of the sulphate does not end with the surrendering up of its golden richness, but it is sold at three cents per pound, and converted into a common article of paint, which, after passing through the mill, is of a violet color.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 51This article was published with the title “Extraction of Gold from Dross” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 51 (), p. 405
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08281858-405c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe