Extrasolar Planet's Missing Water Discovered?

New result may resolve recent measurements that did not spot water on distant "hot Jupiters"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A hot, Jupiter–like planet orbiting a distant star has water in its atmosphere, according to a new analysis. Three teams of astronomers reported in February that they could not detect water vapor in light coming from a pair of gaseous planets outside our solar system, even though theories predicted it should be there.

[For an update on this story, click here.]

Now astronomer Travis Barman of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Ariz., says he found the missing water by analyzing light that shined through the atmosphere of one of those planets, called HD 209458 b. "It's not really that surprising," Barman says, because models of such planets' atmospheres predict that water should be mixed in. "Finding it just reassures us that we know what we're doing."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Barman took a second look at Hubble Space Telescope data collected by Harvard astronomers, who measured the light coming from HD 209458 b as it reached the widest part of its 3.5-day orbit around its star. They determined the planet's radius at 10 different wavelength bands, from 300-nanometer ultraviolet light to 1000-nanometer infrared. Its atmosphere absorbs each band by a different amount, so the planet looks larger in some wavelengths than in others.

"I'm able to simulate the passing of starlight through extrasolar planets," Barman says, and, therefore, he knew how much light water would absorb. He checked the wavelengths between 900 and 1000 nanometers and, sure enough, he saw the trace of water molecules, he reports in a paper to be published in The Astrophysical Journal. "Their added opacity makes [the planet] appear roughly 1 percent larger," he says.

The observations reported in February were of infrared light coming from the side of the planet that faced the star. The heat of the daylight could have cooked the atmosphere evenly all the way down, Barman says, which reduces absorption of light by atmospheric molecules. Starlight grazing the planet's limb, where day meets night, does not have that problem, he says.

"I find it quite convincing," says Jonathan Fortney, a planetary scientist at NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., who has also modeled the atmospheres of extrasolar planets, of which more than 100 are now known. "This is a totally different data set" than the earlier studies, which were challenging to perform, he adds. "It was great that [they] got done, but it was a little patchy.'

The result is important, Fortney says, because "we would like to be able to understand the atmospheres of all planets around other stars. … It's really going to be exciting to see how well we understand these extrasolar planets as we move down to smaller things more the size of Earth. … It's one of the first steps toward that long path."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe