New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Extreme Weather Events Raise Death Rates for Weeks

Emergency room visits and deaths can be heightened for weeks after a major extreme weather event, according to a new study

Ambulances surrounding patiend being evacuated from hopsital

Evacuation from Bellevue Hospital October 31, 2012 in New York City. The hospital had been operating on backup generators since losing power during Hurricane Sandy but had to be evacuated once the extent of the damage became clear.

Allison Joyce/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | Emergency room visits and deaths can be heightened for weeks after a major extreme weather event, according to a new study from researchers at two Massachusetts hospitals that highlights gaps in federal tracking for billion-dollar disasters.

The study, published Thursday in Nature Medicine, looked at weather events between 2011 and 2016 that caused more than $1 billion in damages and compared them with data from Medicare. They found that one week after major weather events, emergency department visits and mortality remained elevated by more than 1 percent from pre-disaster levels, and deaths remained elevated for as much as six weeks after the event.

“These findings suggest that the biggest weather disasters have broad and long-lasting impacts on health emergencies and deaths among those who have Medicare,” said lead author Renee Salas, an emergency room physician at Massachusetts General Hospital.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Salas and her co-authors see their study as a jumping-off point for further research — particularly to help fill gaps in the ways the federal government quantifies the toll of disaster.

The authors collected information about billion-dollar disasters from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information. It reports the number of immediate deaths associated with each disaster, but the researchers say their study could act as “proof of concept” for how to extend mortality reporting to include longer-term data following a disaster.

Tracking the impact that disasters have on emergency room visits, hospitalizations and deaths also can help “lay the ground work” for additional studies to quantify the health care costs of disasters — something not included in the billion-dollar price tag tracked by the federal government.

“Given the speed and scale with which these disasters have been occurring, we need to understand the problem, and I hope there will be many more researchers who look into this,” Salas said. “With billion-dollar disasters happening with increased frequency, having an updated analysis of these events is important."

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2024. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe