Eye of the Beholder

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The only factor separating someone from an eating disorder may be a healthy dollop of self-delusion.

Psychologists have tried to identify whether individuals with eating problems have distorted perceptions or feelings about their bodies, but the findings have been unconvincing. Researchers from the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands recently tried a different approach. First they asked individuals from two groups to rate their own attractiveness. One group had symptoms of eating disorders. People in the other, control group had been chosen because their (normal) body sizes were similar to those of the disordered group. The investigators presented pictures of everyone’s bodies, with the heads cropped out, to two panels of evaluators. Somehow, despite the size similarity, both sets of evaluators rated those with eating disorders as less attractive — in accord with the ratings the disordered individuals gave themselves.

In contrast, the control subjects overestimated their own attractiveness, suggesting they have a biased, protective body image. To treat people with eating disorders, doctors might teach them to focus on their attractive features, the experimenters propose.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Eye of the Beholder” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 3 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0606-11a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe