Eyebomb Your Brain

How googly eyes hack your visual circuits

VANYU KRASTEV

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In January 2017 Adam decided that the six-month Scandinavian winter had lasted for too long already, and he must do something—anything—to combat his boredom. So as one does, he bought himself a bunch of googly eyes and stuck them all over his hometown of Uppsala, Sweden, to the amusement of passersby.

According to the Googly Eyes Foundation, which has the noble mission of spreading the trend “all over the world,” eyebombing is a form of urban art, consisting of sticking googly eyes “onto an inanimate object in the public sphere, in a way that cleverly lends the object the appearance of a living creature.” The movement, which has been around for more than a decade, has reached countless metropolitan locations, including the streets of Paris, London, and Sofia, Bulgaria, where the artist Vanyu Krastev searches for “things that are broken, ruptured, punctured, tangled, crumbling or twisted” as the best candidates for eyebombing.

Whereas the practice of eyebombing may not suit everybody’s taste, the anthropomorphic illusions that result are remarkably powerful. Why should a mere pair of googly eyes change a tea kettle into an Emperor penguin or transmute a tree trunk into a bewildered, long-nosed man?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: VANYU KRASTEV

The answer lies both in our brain’s ability to extract meaningful—though not necessarily accurate—information from the endless chaos that bombards our senses, as well as in our visual system’s obsession with faces and gazes. Pareidolia, our peculiar ability to detect faces in water stains, clouds and even grilled cheese sandwiches, arises from our exquisitely sensitive face-detection neurons, located in a specialized brain region called the fusiform gyrus. Damage to this area results in face blindness, or prosopagnosia, which in the most severe cases makes sufferers unable to recognize themselves in pictures and even mirrors.

In the healthy brain, face-detection circuits are finely tuned to eyes and eye-shaped objects. Not long after birth, babies display strong interest in cartoon faces consisting of eyes and mouths only. Similarly, eye-tracking experiments reveal that we do not observe people’s faces in general, but we direct our gaze most intensively to the eyes and mouths of those around us. 

It follows that googly eyes—no matter how cartoonish—generate so much activation in our face-detection circuits that the ingenious addition of a few cracks and splotches (on a lamppost, say, or on a brick wall) suffices to complete our perceptual experience of an expressive face. Which goes a long way to explain why the character Forky from Toy Story 4 is not only compelling but also instantly believable.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik
SA Mind Vol 31 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Eyebomb Your Brain” in SA Mind Vol. 31 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052020-6o8FbyaT1LLAZq3j8ohhcL

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe