Eyeing Redness

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Color vision may have originated in humans and related primates to spot blushes on cheeks and faces pale with fear. Whereas birds' and bees' color receptors are evenly sensitive across the visible spectrum, two of the three kinds of color photoreceptors in humans and other Old World primates are both most sensitive to roughly 550-nanometerwavelength light. California Institute of Technology neurobiologists suggest that this closeness in sensitivities is optimized toward detecting subtle changes in skin tone because of varying concentrations of oxygenated hemoglobin in the blood. This could help primates tell if a potential mate is rosy from good health or if an enemy is blanched with alarm. Supporting this idea, they say in their upcoming June 22 Biology Letters paper, is the fact that Old World primates tend to be bare-faced and barebottomed, the better to color-signal with.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Eyeing Redness” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 5 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0506-29c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe