Failed eruption shook Saudi Arabia

Long-distance magma flow triggered thousands of earthquakes.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Richard Lovett

A "failed" volcanic eruption caused a swarm of more than 30,000 earthquakes in a remote region of Saudi Arabia last year, a team of U.S. and Saudi scientists has found. The quakes show that plate boundaries can make their influence felt at far greater distances than researchers had supposed.

Magma rose from the bottom of the crust to within 2 kilometers of the surface, says team leader John Pallister, a volcanologist at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cascades Volcano Observatory in Vancouver, Wash. But rather than forming a conventional magma chamber, it forced its way through the rocks in a sheet, known as a dyke, many kilometers wide and as little as a meter thick.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The volcanic earthquakes caused by the magma's movement and the subsequent shattering of rocks are very different from those caused by tectonic movements. "They don't have a main shock and aftershock sequence," says Pallister. "Instead, there are many thousands of little earthquakes."

Many of the earthquakes measured 2 or less on the Richter scale, and so were detectable only by instruments. But one, on May 19, 2009, had a magnitude of 5.4 according to Saudi Geological Survey estimates, and 5.7 according to the USGS.

That was enough to open up an 8-kilometer-long fissure across the desert and to crack walls and foundations in a nearby town, forcing the evacuation of 40,000 people.

Near miss

The scientists' first job was to determine whether a volcanic eruption was imminent. They concluded that it wasn't. They also had to assess whether larger earthquakes could occur, but this is unlikely for volcanic earthquakes, Pallister says.

In the process, the Saudi authorities deployed an array of seismometers, and U.S .scientists used satellite-based laser altimetry to watch the surface as it bulged upward by as much as half a meter, measuring the uplift to an accuracy of 3 centimeters.

"It's just an amazing set of data," Pallister says. "It's one of the best examples anyone has ever seen of [monitoring] this type of deformation." The study is published this week in Nature Geoscience.

"We're documenting for the first time some aspects of this magma intrusion process," says Cynthia Ebinger, a geophysicist from the University of Rochester, N.Y., who has studied similar failed eruptions in East Africa.

The near-eruption occurred in an ancient lava field called Harrat Lunayyir in northwest Saudi Arabia. The area has seen many eruptions over the past 20 million years, but no volcanic activity in recorded history.

Now the region may be primed for future eruptions, failed or otherwise. "A pathway from the mantle nearly to the surface was established," says Pallister. "That's the type of thing that tends to get reactivated."

Safety implications

The volcanic activity in Harrat Lunayyir was of the type associated with the spreading of tectonic plates. But the main rift zone is almost 200 kilometers away, in the middle of the Red Sea. This, says Pallister, suggests that bits of hot mantle that are upwelling beneath the Red Sea have leaked out under Saudi Arabia.

For a rift zone to make its effects felt over such a long distance is unknown. "We're going to have to go back and revise textbook models to understand why we have active volcanism and active stretching in an area away from a plate boundary," says Gillian Foulger, a seismologist at Durham University, UK. "It shows that the simple picture of magmatism is unrealistic."

The finding also has implications for public safety. Most of Saudi Arabia's lava fields are in remote regions, but development near Medina is encroaching on a region known to have had a surface eruption in 1256.

And the Kenyan capital Nairobi lies within 100 kilometers of a volcanic region, says Ebinger. "We need a reassessment of volcanic hazards throughout East Africa and the Red Sea area," she adds.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe