New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Family of Genes May Explain Some Cases of Male Infertility

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers at the University of California at San Francisco have discovered the patriarch of a family of genes closely tied to male infertility in many species. Humans share the new gene, named BOULE, with both mice and flies. And results published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that BOULE is involved in the creation of sperm during meiosis¿the phase of division in which a cell duplicates its DNA and then splits twice, giving each cell half the necessary chromosomes.

Scientists had previously linked two descendants of BOULE¿genes known as DAZ and DAZL¿to male infertility. Mutations of DAZ are implicated in 13 percent of all cases of human male infertility, even though the gene doesn't seem to be essential to sperm development. Although DAZL¿s exact role in humans is not known, in frogs it appears to be fundamental to the development of both male and female reproductive cells, or germ cells, before meiosis occurs.

The new study¿s results suggest that BOULE, unlike DAZ, may be required for mature sperm development. If defects in BOULE are found to be a cause of human male infertility, lead author Eugene Yujun Xu notes, attempts at gene therapy¿in which a normal copy of the gene could be introduced into the testes and encouraged to replicate¿might be possible. And because the testes are located outside the body, the treatment would be less likely to damage other body tissues, he says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe