Family of Genes May Explain Some Cases of Male Infertility

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers at the University of California at San Francisco have discovered the patriarch of a family of genes closely tied to male infertility in many species. Humans share the new gene, named BOULE, with both mice and flies. And results published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that BOULE is involved in the creation of sperm during meiosis¿the phase of division in which a cell duplicates its DNA and then splits twice, giving each cell half the necessary chromosomes.

Scientists had previously linked two descendants of BOULE¿genes known as DAZ and DAZL¿to male infertility. Mutations of DAZ are implicated in 13 percent of all cases of human male infertility, even though the gene doesn't seem to be essential to sperm development. Although DAZL¿s exact role in humans is not known, in frogs it appears to be fundamental to the development of both male and female reproductive cells, or germ cells, before meiosis occurs.

The new study¿s results suggest that BOULE, unlike DAZ, may be required for mature sperm development. If defects in BOULE are found to be a cause of human male infertility, lead author Eugene Yujun Xu notes, attempts at gene therapy¿in which a normal copy of the gene could be introduced into the testes and encouraged to replicate¿might be possible. And because the testes are located outside the body, the treatment would be less likely to damage other body tissues, he says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe