Farmers Must Adapt as U.S. Corn Belt Shifts Northward

As the climate changes, so will the prime area for growing corn and soy in the Midwest

Water floods a cornfield in Malden, Illinois, U.S., on Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Farmers have been warned for years that climate change will disrupt growing conditions and crop yields.

Pennsylvania State University researchers released findings this week suggesting those changes could come within the lifetimes of many current farmers and that warming could have major implications for the Corn Belt, the heart of the U.S. agricultural economy.

Moreover, the research shows the core Corn Belt states may no longer represent the center of American corn and soybean production, and that more suitable conditions for the commodity crops may shift northward from Illinois and Iowa to Minnesota and the Dakotas.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers conclude that such a shift “is in progress, and there is a strong probability it will continue,” according to an analysis published in Environmental Research Letters.

The study, which relies on advanced modeling using artificial intelligence and machine learning, does not conclude that corn and soybean production will cease in traditional growing regions of the Midwest. Rather, it signals that farmers will need to adapt to changing conditions over the next several decades.

“We’re not suggesting that such a shift would be a catastrophe,” said Armen Kemanian, associate professor of production systems and modeling at Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences. “The changes are likely to be gradual, and farmers and the supply chain should be able to adapt. But things will change.”

Farmers already besieged by extreme weather and economic strain may need to adopt farming practices and other adaptive measures. They might plant two crops in a year, for example, or grow a greater diversity of crops instead of the long-standing practice of rotating between corn and soybeans, the researchers said.

Three crops evaluated in the study—corn, soybeans and sorghum—“have distinct responses to humidity and temperature,” according to lead researcher Alexis Hoffman. In general, corn needs more humidity, sorghum tolerates higher temperatures, and soybeans need a combination of both.

How temperature and humidity conditions change across geographic regions will help determine where different crops perform the best. The findings further showed that the most suitable growing conditions for corn and soybeans under various climate change scenarios would “become narrower and move north from current conditions.”

Seth Meyer, a research professor and associate director of the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri, said the findings suggest that Midwestern farmers could experience “a big shift” in geography and climate conditions in the future, but that technological advances in seed varieties allow corn and soybeans to grow outside their traditional areas.

He also noted that farmers have been resilient to extreme weather events but added, “From what I know, the bigger [climate] impacts are yet to come.”

Nathan Fields, vice president for production and sustainability at the National Corn Growers Association, said the study’s results are consistent with the association’s own research and that “it’s an undeniable truth” that crop-growing conditions are changing due to climate change.

He also said that changing climate conditions—particularly with respect to temperature and soil conditions—can have positive or negative impacts on farmers. For example, a warmer climate could extend the growing season and allow farmers to increase yields. But changing conditions could also create more suitable environments for weeds and harmful insects.

“Growers in Iowa don’t usually have the same problems as growers in the Mississippi Delta, but they may soon,” he added.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Daniel Cusick covers climate change adaptation and resilience. He joined E&E News in 2003 and has filed news stories from South Florida to Northern Minnesota. He has reported from more than a half dozen hurricane recovery zones and documented climate change impacts, resilience and energy transitions in East Africa. He lives in Minneapolis.

More by Daniel Cusick

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe