New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Spanish Is Faster Than English, But Mandarin Is Slow

Some languages sound faster than others, but most convey information at the same rate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Speakers of some languages seem to rattle away at high speed like machine-guns, while other languages sound rather slow and plodding,” wrote linguist Peter Roach in 1998. A few months ago re­searchers systematically quantified Roach’s observation and offered a sur­prising explanation. Last year, in an issue of the journal Language, François Pel­legrino and his colleagues at the Univer­sity of Lyon in France published their analysis of the speech of 59 people read­ing the same 20 texts aloud in seven languages. They found Japanese and Spanish, often described as “fast lan­guages,” clocked the greatest number of syllables per second. The “slowest” language in the set was Mandarin, followed closely by German.

But the story does not end there. The researchers also calculated the infor­mation density for the syllables of each language by comparing them with an eighth language, Vietnamese, which served as an arbitrary reference. They found that an average Spanish syllable conveys only a small quantity of infor­mation, contributing just a fragment to the overall meaning of a sentence. In contrast, an individual Mandarin sylla­ble contains a much larger quantity of information, possibly because Mandarin syllables in­clude tones. The upshot is that Spanish and Mandarin actually convey information to listeners at about the same rate. The correlation between speech rate and information density held for five out of seven of the lan­guages studied, and the researchers conjectured that, despite the diversity of languages in the world, over time they all deliver a constant rate of information, possibly tuned to the human perceptual system.

The results of these studies could change the way we think about the di­versity of the world’s languages. In the 1950s linguist Noam Chomsky proposed the idea of universal grammar, which suggests that all languages, their ap­parent differences notwith­standing, possess a common set of abstract structures. This hypothesis galva­nized the field of linguistics, but truly com­mon structures proved tough to find. The current research suggests that languages can and do use a wide variety of structures, as long as they deliver information to listeners at a relatively constant rate. Thought of in this way, universal grammar is no longer an abstract notion but a linch­pin of human communication that ensures a steady flow of information from speaker to listener.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The article was published in print as "Fast Talkers."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Spanish Is Faster Than English, But Mandarin Is Slow” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042012-7qvOAzmj0WOnUPZUdTyaJ4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe