Fat Side of the Moon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The moon's far side bulges at its equator, a peculiarity that has long puzzled investigators. Scientists conjectured that the bulge formed when magma oceans that covered the young moon solidified while deformed by gravity and lunar spin, but the hypothesis failed to match theories of the moon's early orbit with its precise dimensions. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology now calculate that they could explain the bulge if the moon's orbit 100 million to 200 million years after the moon formed was about twice as close to Earth and more oval. This orbit, resembling present-day Mercury's in completing three rotations for every two revolutions, would have proved ideal to help freeze the bulge in place. The findings, appearing in the August 4 Science, also suggest a time on Earth when the moon cycled through its phases in just 18 hours and raised tides four times a day at up to 10 times the strength.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Fat Side of the Moon” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 4 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1006-32a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe