New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fear of Spreading Earth Germs on Could Divert Mars Rover

International rules on microbe contamination may stymie Curiosity's bid to study suspected water in hillside streaks 

These dark, narrow, 100 meter-long streaks called recurring slope lineae flowing downhill on Mars are inferred to have been formed by contemporary flowing water.

Four years into its travels across Mars, NASA’s Curiosity rover faces an un­expected challenge: wending its way safely among dozens of dark streaks that could indicate water seeping from the red planet’s hillsides.

Although scientists might love to investigate the streaks at close range, strict international rules prohibit Curiosity from touching any part of Mars that could host liquid water, to prevent contamination. But as the rover begins climbing the mountain Aeolis Mons next month, it will probably pass within a few kilometres of a dark streak that grew and shifted between February and July 2012 in ways suggestive of flowing water.

NASA officials are trying to determine whether Earth microbes aboard Curiosity could contaminate the Martian seeps from a distance. If the risk is too high, NASA could shift the rover’s course—but that would present a daunting geographical challenge. There is only one obvious path to the ancient geological formations that Curiosity scientists have been yearning to sample for years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We’re very excited to get up to these layers and find the 3-billion-year-old water,” says Ashwin Vasavada, Curiosity’s project scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California. “Not the ten-day-old water.”

The streaks—dubbed recurring slope lineae (RSLs) because they appear, fade away and re­appear seasonally on steep slopes—were first reported on Mars five years ago in a handful of places. The total count is now up to 452 possible RSLs. More than half of those are in the enormous equatorial canyon of Valles Marineris, but they also appear at other latitudes and longitudes. “We’re just finding them all over the place,” says David Stillman, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, who leads the cataloguing.

Dark marks

RSLs typically measure a few metres across and hundreds of metres long. One leading idea is that they form when the chilly Martian surface warms just enough to thaw an ice dam in the soil, allowing water to begin seeping downhill. When temperatures drop, the water freezes and the hillside lightens again until next season. But the picture is complicated by factors such as potential salt in the water; brines may seep at lower temperatures than fresher water.

Other possible explanations for the streaks include water condensing from the atmosphere, or the flow of bone-dry debris. “They have a lot of behaviours that resemble liquid water,” says Colin Dundas, a planetary geologist at the US Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Arizona. “But Mars is a strange place, and it’s worth considering the possibility there are dry processes that could surprise us.”

A study published last month used orbital infrared data to suggest that typical RSLs contain no more than 3% water. And other streaky-slope Martian features, known as gullies, were initially thought to be caused by liquid water but are now thought to be formed mostly by carbon dioxide frost.

Dundas and his colleagues have counted 58 possible RSLs near Curiosity’s landing site in Gale Crater. Many of them appeared after a planet-wide dust storm in 2007—possibly because the dust acted as a greenhouse and temporarily warmed the surface, Stillman says.

Since January, mission scientists have used the ChemCam instrument aboard the rover—which includes a small telescope—to photograph nearby streaks whenever possible.

So far, the rover has taken pictures of 8 of the 58 locations and seen no changes. The features are lines on slopes, but they have not yet recurred. “We’ve got two of the three letters in the acronym,” says Ryan Anderson, a geologist at the US Geological Survey who leads the imaging campaign.

Curiosity is currently about 5 kilometres away from the potential RSLs; on its current projected path, it would never get any closer than about 2 kilometres, Vasavada says. The rover could not physically drive up and touch the streaks if it wanted to, because it cannot navigate the slopes of 25 degrees or greater on which they appear.

But the rover’s sheer unexpected proximity to RSLs has NASA re-evaluating its planetary-protection protocols. Curiosity was only partly sterilized before going to Mars, and experts at JPL and NASA headquarters in Washington DC are calculating how long the remaining microbes could survive in Mars’s harsh atmosphere—as well as what weather conditions could transport them several kilometres away and possibly contaminate a water seep. “That hasn’t been well quantified for any mission,” says Vasavada.

The work is an early test for the NASA Mars rover slated to launch in 2020, which will look for life and collect and stash samples for possible return to Earth. RSLs exist at several of the rover’s eight possible landing sites.

For now, Curiosity is finishing exploring the Murray Buttes. These spectacular rock towers formed from sediment at the bottom of ancient lakes—the sort of potentially life-supporting environment the rover was sent to find. Curiosity’s second extended mission begins on 1 October.

Barring disaster, the rover’s lifespan will be set by its nuclear-power source, which will continue to dwindle in coming years through radioactive decay. Curiosity still has kilometres to scale on Aeolis Mons as it moves towards its final destination, a sulfate-rich group of rocks.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 7, 2016.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe