Feast, Famine, Freedom

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thoughts of food seem to consume us, weighing heavily on our minds. We hungrily scan the headlines, seeking ways to battle excess pounds. We devour diet advice, to little avail. Despite our good intentions, obesity rates keep climbing. Why is it so hard to stop overeating? “When our stomach begins to growl, too often it drowns out any good advice coming from our brain,” writes psychiatrist Oliver Grimm in his article “Addicted to Food?” Any person may have difficulty with restraint at times, as Grimm explains. For binge eaters, the problem intensifies; the brain's reward system can go haywire. In neurobiological terms, binge eating is not dissimilar to drug addiction. Turn to page 36 for details.

At the other end of the food-behavior scale, a person who has, in effect, too much control over what he or she ingests can suffer from self-imposed starvation. People afflicted with disorders such as anorexia eat too little because their distorted mental image of their body looks larger than reality, explain Christian Eggers and Verena Liebers in “Through a Glass, Darkly,” which starts on page 30. To return to normal weight, anorexics must learn to adjust their flawed perceptions.

We typically judge “vegetative” patients, who are unresponsive, as being mentally incapable. Are our perceptions misleading us again? In “Freeing a Locked-In Mind,” beginning on page 40, staff editor Karen Schrock tells how brain-imaging studies have revealed that some of these patients are, in fact, aware but unable to command their useless body to react. The exciting finding offers hope that we may soon be able to reach at least a number of the 250,000 Americans who have consciousness disorders. In this issue and others, Scientific American Mind documents science's efforts to burst such mental shackles—whether behavioral or biological in nature. Stay tuned.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 2This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 2 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0407-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe