Federal Agencies Hope for a Mild Fire Season

But climate change and exotic weeds may exacerbate the risk of catastrophic fires

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Prepare yourself for this year's upcoming fire season: It is going to be a mild one.

At least, that is what state and federal officials said in a briefing yesterday at the Department of Agriculture. So far this year, about 1.3 million acres have burned -- average for this time of year, according to the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC).

NIFC, which does not have a director of its own, coordinates the firefighting efforts of eight organizations and federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Forestry Service.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said that the incursion of exotic weeds poses a threat to fire safety by significantly increasing the fuel stock where those plants did not previously take root. Forest fires are burning earlier in the year, for longer periods of time and at higher elevations than federal agencies were accustomed to, he said.

Federal agencies currently have $500 million allocated for the regular account of fire suppression funds and an addition $61 million through a separate FLAME account should normal funds be depleted. The account was established as part of the FLAME Act 2009, which allowed budget allocations for fire suppression to be determined by prior-year data, such as fire suppression expenditures and predictive modeling. Previously funding was determined by a 10-year rolling average.

In 2008, the U.S. Forest Service spent more than 50 percent of its budget putting out fires, according to the National Association of State Foresters. Last year, about 80 percent of wildfires happened on state-owned land. And, in every year for the past 10 years, fire suppression costs have exceeded $1 billion.

The destruction of 5.2 million acres in 2008 rose more than $2 billion in costs and damages, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

More fires and longer burns
Climate change, Salazar said, also presented a growing threat to many parts of the country.

"Wildfire is a natural part of the western landscape," read a 2007 report by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, but "in recent decades, a trend toward earlier spring snowmelt and hotter, drier summers has already increased the number and duration of large wildfires in the West."

NIFC meteorologist Rick Ochoa, also at the briefing, said that while some regions experienced a wetter winter -- due, in part, to the effects of last year's El Niño -- the resulting new vegetation is now at risk of drought. The drought makes those plants particularly susceptible to fire.

The wet winter in the Northwest, Ochoa said, most likely pushed the region's normal fire season to August, rather than July.

However, large portions of Nevada, where new grasses and other plants grew in response to the unusually wet winter, could see significant threats if drought conditions continue. The Southwest, in general, Ochoa said, is currently going through "very dry conditions" and will most likely become fire-active in July.

Snowpack was also lighter than normal in Colorado, which depends on mountain meltwater for much of its freshwater. The lack of water in the state could present more stresses to any future fires in the area.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe