New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Feed Your Mind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When we launched Scientific American Mind as a new publication in 2004, it seemed like a great opportunity to give readers more stories about popular areas of mind and brain research—which, fortuitously, were also booming because of imaging and other advances. What I didn’t realize at the time, but probably should have, is how often the findings in our pages would shake loose what I thought I knew about how our gray matter works. In every way, editing this magazine over the years has been, well, mind-expanding.

Take creativity, the subject of our cover story, “The Unleashed Mind,” by Harvard University psychologist Shelley Carson. It is common for people to refer, with a knowing wink, to “creative types”—and we all know what that means. We think of someone a little … different from the rest of us workaday sorts. Someone who surprises us with spectacularly odd wardrobe choices but also with amazing insights into problems we are trying to solve.

How do they do that? As it turns out, the elements that spur those creative insights—as well as a tendency to eccentricity—spring from something called cognitive disinhibition, which is characterized by an impaired ability of the brain to filter out extraneous details. When that unfiltered flow reaches the cortex of someone who is highly intelligent and who can process the information without being overwhelmed, novel ideas can burst forth. Of course, not everybody who is creative is unconventional, and vice versa.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An essential way to nurture new notions often results from getting a different perspective on things. So after this issue, I will take a step back from Scientific American Mind’s day-to-day operations, the better to contribute to its long-term direction. Sandra Upson, who joins us as managing editor, will bring her own blend of insights, ideas and creative directions for the magazine. I can’t wait to see what the team does next.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 2This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 2 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0511-1a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe