Feed Your Mind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When we launched Scientific American Mind as a new publication in 2004, it seemed like a great opportunity to give readers more stories about popular areas of mind and brain research—which, fortuitously, were also booming because of imaging and other advances. What I didn’t realize at the time, but probably should have, is how often the findings in our pages would shake loose what I thought I knew about how our gray matter works. In every way, editing this magazine over the years has been, well, mind-expanding.

Take creativity, the subject of our cover story, “The Unleashed Mind,” by Harvard University psychologist Shelley Carson. It is common for people to refer, with a knowing wink, to “creative types”—and we all know what that means. We think of someone a little … different from the rest of us workaday sorts. Someone who surprises us with spectacularly odd wardrobe choices but also with amazing insights into problems we are trying to solve.

How do they do that? As it turns out, the elements that spur those creative insights—as well as a tendency to eccentricity—spring from something called cognitive disinhibition, which is characterized by an impaired ability of the brain to filter out extraneous details. When that unfiltered flow reaches the cortex of someone who is highly intelligent and who can process the information without being overwhelmed, novel ideas can burst forth. Of course, not everybody who is creative is unconventional, and vice versa.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An essential way to nurture new notions often results from getting a different perspective on things. So after this issue, I will take a step back from Scientific American Mind’s day-to-day operations, the better to contribute to its long-term direction. Sandra Upson, who joins us as managing editor, will bring her own blend of insights, ideas and creative directions for the magazine. I can’t wait to see what the team does next.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 2This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 2 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0511-1a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe