New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

FEMA Disaster Money Flowing Again after Budget Standoff

The Federal Emergency Management Agency will resume funding long-term rebuilding projects after withholding funds since August

Deanne Criswell speaking in front of a FEMA sign.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Deanne Criswell holds a press conference on Hurricane Ian at FEMA Headquarters on September 28, 2022 in Washington, DC. The agency ended its spending restrictions for disaster aid after lawmakers averted a government shutdown over the weekend.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | The Federal Emergency Management Agency lifted temporary spending restrictions Monday that had held up $3 billion for states to rebuild from disasters that occurred in recent years.

FEMA said it would resume giving states money for rebuilding projects because it received $16 billion in the temporary spending bill that Congress and President Joe Biden signed Saturday.

The agency, facing a dwindling budget, had stopped funding long-term projects Aug. 29 to save money for emergency costs such as temporary shelters and road clearing immediately after a disaster.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The spending restrictions forced FEMA to withhold funding for 2,400 nonemergency projects that the agency had approved such as rebuilding damaged roads and structures. It was the first time FEMA had imposed “immediate needs funding” restrictions since 2017.

FEMA said it expects to fund all delayed projects “within the next several weeks.”

The $16 billion for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund was included in a temporary spending package Congress approved one day before the end of fiscal 2023 when most federal employees were to stop working due to a lack of funding.

Biden had asked Congress in August to give FEMA $16 billion through a special allocation to enable the agency to continue operating in full.

FEMA’s disaster fund had dwindled to about $2 billion, which can be spent quickly if a wildfire, storm or flood causes significant damage.

The agency’s decision to withhold funds did not automatically block newly approved rebuilding projects. But withholding funds forced states and localities to pay for projects themselves and wait for FEMA reimbursement or to delay the start of the projects.

FEMA typically pays 75 percent of projects that rebuild public facilities after a major disaster.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe