Trump Says FEMA Overhaul Will Come after Hurricane Season

States will continue to get FEMA federal disaster aid this year but may see less assistance after changes made in 2026

Bridge damaged by hurricane

Remnants of the Lake Lure Flowering Bridge are seen along the Broad River in a landscape scarred by Hurricane Helene on March 24, 2025 in Lake Lure, North Carolina. Nearly six months after the historic storm, communities in western North Carolina continue the recovery process.

Sean Rayford/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his administration will wait until after this hurricane season to begin cutting disaster aid to states.

Trump’s comments to reporters during an Oval Office briefing are the clearest signal yet that Trump would continue to help states grapple with disasters for at least several more months, despite his threats to abolish the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

When asked how much disaster-related costs would be shifted to states from FEMA, Trump at one point turned to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and said, “We think, after this... Kristi, I’d say after the hurricane season, we’ll start phasing—”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We set up a FEMA council,” Noem interjected. “Over the next couple of months, we’ll be working on reforms and what FEMA will look like in the future as a different agency.”

“We’re going to give out less money,” Trump said, reiterating his plan to give states more responsibility for rebuilding after disasters.

Trump created the FEMA Review Council led by Noem and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to issue recommendations for overhauling the agency by Nov. 16 — two weeks before the end of the Atlantic hurricane season. Trump has repeatedly criticized FEMA as ineffective.

His comments came one day after he approved two separate requests for disaster aid from Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe (R) following devastating tornadoes and storms in April.

In late May, Trump approved 10 disaster declarations after a weekslong delay prevented some areas from beginning cleanup, resulting in pressure from governors and lawmakers who pushed the president to pick up the pace. Trump proposed a record amount of money for FEMA’s disaster fund in his fiscal 2026 budget request to Congress.

Trump's budget director, Ross Vought, said at the news briefing Tuesday that FEMA's disaster fund is “projected to get us all the way into the end of the fiscal year” Sept. 30.

But a monthly report on the disaster fund released by FEMA on June 3 projects the fund will have a $7.8 billion deficit in September. The report reflects the fund’s financial condition on April 30.

Neither the White House nor the Office of Management and Budget responded to requests for comment about Vought's assertion.

The monthly reports from FEMA often show the disaster fund running out of money in the final months of the fiscal year and sometimes help prod Congress to add money to the fund.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2025. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe