New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

FEMA Will Give Extra Money to States for Low-Carbon Rebuilding after Disasters

As part of its effort to prod the construction industry to go green, the Biden administration is providing new funding for rebuilding with low-carbon materials after disasters

Home destroyed recovered with plywood

Workers rebuild a home destroyed by Hurricane Michael in Mexico Beach, Fla. The 2018 storm devastated communities across Florida's Panhandle.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | States and communities that rebuild from a disaster will get extra federal money if they use low-carbon construction materials, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Tuesday.

The additional FEMA money will help pay for added costs in purchasing materials such as concrete and steel that are certified as having lower-carbon emissions.

The extra funding arises from a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act, enacted in August, that allows FEMA to pay “costs associated with low-carbon materials” through 2026. FEMA’s plan is part of the Biden administration’s “Buy Clean Initiative” that uses the federal government’s vast purchasing power to spur the development of U.S.-made lower-carbon construction materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


FEMA will provide the additional money for construction projects that are funded by its program that helps communities rebuild after disasters.

The money also will be available for two programs that give states and localities grants for projects that build resilience to disasters such as elevating flood-prone buildings. The grant programs are Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and the Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants programs, both of which fund a wide range of mitigation projects.

FEMA typically pays 75 percent of project costs through the three programs, leaving states and communities to pay the remaining 25 percent. The same ratio will apply to extra money from FEMA for low-carbon materials.

The materials that are eligible for extra money are concrete, asphalt, glass and steel that have an “environmental product declaration” certifying that their production and use results in lower-than-average carbon emissions, according to a FEMA memo.

The extra money “will allow FEMA to do our part in addressing the underlying causes of climate change by covering the costs for the use of low-carbon materials,” FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell said in a statement.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe