FEMA Will Give Extra Money to States for Low-Carbon Rebuilding after Disasters

As part of its effort to prod the construction industry to go green, the Biden administration is providing new funding for rebuilding with low-carbon materials after disasters

Home destroyed recovered with plywood

Workers rebuild a home destroyed by Hurricane Michael in Mexico Beach, Fla. The 2018 storm devastated communities across Florida's Panhandle.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | States and communities that rebuild from a disaster will get extra federal money if they use low-carbon construction materials, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Tuesday.

The additional FEMA money will help pay for added costs in purchasing materials such as concrete and steel that are certified as having lower-carbon emissions.

The extra funding arises from a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act, enacted in August, that allows FEMA to pay “costs associated with low-carbon materials” through 2026. FEMA’s plan is part of the Biden administration’s “Buy Clean Initiative” that uses the federal government’s vast purchasing power to spur the development of U.S.-made lower-carbon construction materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


FEMA will provide the additional money for construction projects that are funded by its program that helps communities rebuild after disasters.

The money also will be available for two programs that give states and localities grants for projects that build resilience to disasters such as elevating flood-prone buildings. The grant programs are Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and the Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants programs, both of which fund a wide range of mitigation projects.

FEMA typically pays 75 percent of project costs through the three programs, leaving states and communities to pay the remaining 25 percent. The same ratio will apply to extra money from FEMA for low-carbon materials.

The materials that are eligible for extra money are concrete, asphalt, glass and steel that have an “environmental product declaration” certifying that their production and use results in lower-than-average carbon emissions, according to a FEMA memo.

The extra money “will allow FEMA to do our part in addressing the underlying causes of climate change by covering the costs for the use of low-carbon materials,” FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell said in a statement.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe