Female Antelopes Fight for Fine Mates

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Humans aren't the only mammals with a swinging singles scene. Nine other species engage in a process known as lekking, whereby bachelor males congregate in certain areas during the mating season looking for love. And according to a report published today in the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, females may be more aggressive about landing eligible males than previously thought.

Earlier work had shown that in bird species that engage in lekking, females often compete for preferred males. For mammals that form leks, however, scientists thought that factors other than mate choice attracted females to the party. Now the new study, conducted by Jacob Bro-J¿rgensen of the Zoological Society of London, reveals that in the case of topi antelopes, leks actually have poorer food supplies, higher rates of predation and higher levels of harassment for females than surrounding areas do. But the opportunity to mate with desirable males, it seems, offsets these drawbacks. After two years of studying topi populations on the Serengeti and Masai Mara plains, Bro-J¿rgenson reports that he witnessed competitive aggression between females (see image) over so-called central males, which tend to be larger and older and to have darker facemasks than their peers. In fact, some females even went so far as to disrupt matings that were already in progress. Bro-J¿rgenson concludes that "the finding suggests that the forces leading to lek evolution in mammals and birds may be more similar than previously acknowledged."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe