Female Chimps Less Promiscuous Than Previously Thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Female chimpanzees are well known for their wanton ways, mating, as they do, with multiple males in the community. But in recent years primatologists have painted an even lustier picture of the female chimp love life, asserting on the basis of genetic data that females routinely sneak away from home for trysts with males from other social groups. Now new findings may restore their reputation for more moderate promiscuity. According to a report published yesterday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the most extensive genetic study to date indicates that, in fact, female chimps rarely mate with males from outside communities.

Extracting DNA from feces, bones, teeth and hair, Christophe Boesch and colleagues from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, conducted paternity tests for 41 chimps belonging to three communities in the Ivory Coast's Ta¿ National Park. In contrast to the earlier study, which inferred 50 percent extragroup paternity, the new study found only a single offspring whose father most likely hailed from a different community. In explanation, the authors suggest that the error rate in the previous study was too high to produce accurate assignments of paternity. "The community is the primary but not exclusive unit for reproduction in wild chimpanzees," they conclude, "and females do not typically reproduce with outside males."

The team also reports that the males in a given social group are not more closely related than the females are. Earlier work had suggested that relatedness among community males is comparable to that of half-siblings, hence the high degree of cooperation seen in male intragroup interactions. Taking the new data into consideration, the researchers propose that rather than having a primarily male-bonded social structure, the chimpanzee group is bonded through relationships between males and females.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe