New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fever Reduction May Be Key to Combating Malaria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Unpleasant though they are, fevers are the body's way of fighting infection. In the case of malaria, however, that defense mechanism may backfire. According to a report published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, fevers enable malaria-infected red blood cells to stick to the walls of blood vessels, which can lead to death.

Although malaria is characterized by fever, studies of parasitized red blood cell adherence have always been conducted at the normal human body temperature. Nicholas J. White of Mahidol University in Bangkok and his colleagues thus decided to investigate the behavior of infected cells in blood heated to temperatures typically seen in malaria cases. Using samples obtained from 12 patients suffering from acute malaria infections, the team found that the stickiness of the parasitized blood cells increased upon heating. At normal body temperatures, in contrast, the blood cells did not exhibit this adherence. Additional findings indicate that the heat-induced stickiness may arise from an increase in levels of a red blood cell surface protein known as PfEMP-1.

The results offer new insight into why malaria patients often deteriorate significantly at the fever stage. They also suggest that, contrary to one popular school of thought, which holds that quelling the fever slows the body's ability to clear the parasite, fever reduction may in fact stymie disease progression and enhance antimalarial drugs' ability to block parasite development.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe