New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fewer People are Calling Poison Control Centers

The latest report reveals that people may be turning to the Internet for guidance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

28.5%—The drop in telephone calls placed to the U.S.'s 55 poison-control centers between 2009 and 2013, according to the most recent report by the American Association of Poison Control Centers. The organization says the steady decline could be the result of the falling U.S. birthrate or growing preference for text messages over phone calls. It might also suggest that more Americans are instead searching the Internet for health advice—even in emergencies. Staffers still field about three million calls a year, picking up the phone every 14 seconds on average. In 2013, 1,218 people with cases logged at poison-control centers died from direct exposure to a poison or drug.

By the Numbers

The five substances that generated the most calls in 2013 were:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


PAIN RELIEVERS

11.5%

COSMETICS/ PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS

7.7%

HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS

7.6%

SEDATIVES/HYPNOTICS/ ANTIPSYCHOTICS

5.9%

ANTIDEPRESSANTS

4.2%

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe