Fido Found to Be Wiz with Words

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dogs may be able to understand far more words than a typical owner teaches them during obedience training. Scientists experimenting with a nine-and-a half-year-old border collie in Germany have discovered that the dog knows more than 200 words for different objects and can learn a new word after being shown an unfamiliar item just one time. The dog¿s ability shows that advanced word recognition skills are present in animals other than humans, and probably evolved independently of language and speech.

Rico, the border collie, was taught to retrieve different objects by his owners, who placed various balls and toys around their apartment and asked Rico to fetch specific ones. Rico gradually increased his vocabulary to about 200 words that he could match to objects. To make sure Rico¿s owners weren¿t giving him subconscious cues that helped him find the right item, Julia Fischer and her colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, tested Rico¿s knowledge in a lab, where he retrieved 37 out of 40 items correctly. "Rico¿s ¿vocabulary size¿ is comparable to that of language-trained apes, dolphins, sea lions, and parrots," the authors write in their report, published today in the journal Science.

The team then tested Rico¿s ability to employ fast mapping, a neurological process that toddlers use to quickly guess the meaning of new words. The researchers put an unfamiliar object in a room with other things he did know and, without teaching Rico the name of the novel item, asked him to get it. Seven times out of 10 he returned with the correct object.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Four weeks later, the scientists tested Rico¿s ability to recall what he had learned. The objects that he had seen only once during the previous experiment were placed among eight other things, some familiar and some completely new. In this trial, Rico retrieved the correct item three out of six times, a feat of learning never before seen in a dog. Rico¿s performance was comparable to that of a three-year-old toddler, the scientists observe.

Fischer and her collaborators note that they¿re not sure whether Rico is exceptionally smart or exceptionally well trained, but they hope they can use this experiment to further probe how the brain learns to understand words. Rico¿s powers of comprehension, they say, show that the processes the brain uses to discern words are not the same as those used to produce speech. Says Fischer: "You don¿t have to be able to talk to understand a lot."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe