Fierce Forecasts for Mt. Etna Eruptions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mt. Etna, located in the northeast of Sicily, is one of the earth's most active volcanoes. In July of 2001, an eruption destroyed buildings in a tourist refuge and threatened the town of Nicolosi. Fifteen months later, another outburst produced more menacing lava flows. Now scientists say that Etna's future may prove to be even more dangerous than its storied past.

Domenico Patane of the National Institute on Geophysics and Volcanology in Catania, Italy, and his colleagues analyzed data on 647 earthquakes that occurred near Mt. Etna between 1994 and 2001. In a paper published online last week by the journal Science, the team argues that during that period, a huge volume of magma intruded below the volcano at the intersection of two fault lines. According to the report, the magma was initially confined to between six and 15 kilometers below sea level, but compression of the chamber combined with the magma's increasing volume forced it up to shallower depths. The escalating pressure within the mountain's plumbing system has fractured the rock and led to the most recent eruptions.

The blasts that began in 2001 differ from Etna's other blasts of the last 30 years. The scientists point out that older eruptions were typically followed by periods of very low seismic activity that could last for periods between a few months and two years. But after the 2001 outburst, seismic activity remained high. They conclude that "Mt. Etna eruptive activity could become more frequent, voluminous and potentially hazardous in the near future."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe