New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fierce Forecasts for Mt. Etna Eruptions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mt. Etna, located in the northeast of Sicily, is one of the earth's most active volcanoes. In July of 2001, an eruption destroyed buildings in a tourist refuge and threatened the town of Nicolosi. Fifteen months later, another outburst produced more menacing lava flows. Now scientists say that Etna's future may prove to be even more dangerous than its storied past.

Domenico Patane of the National Institute on Geophysics and Volcanology in Catania, Italy, and his colleagues analyzed data on 647 earthquakes that occurred near Mt. Etna between 1994 and 2001. In a paper published online last week by the journal Science, the team argues that during that period, a huge volume of magma intruded below the volcano at the intersection of two fault lines. According to the report, the magma was initially confined to between six and 15 kilometers below sea level, but compression of the chamber combined with the magma's increasing volume forced it up to shallower depths. The escalating pressure within the mountain's plumbing system has fractured the rock and led to the most recent eruptions.

The blasts that began in 2001 differ from Etna's other blasts of the last 30 years. The scientists point out that older eruptions were typically followed by periods of very low seismic activity that could last for periods between a few months and two years. But after the 2001 outburst, seismic activity remained high. They conclude that "Mt. Etna eruptive activity could become more frequent, voluminous and potentially hazardous in the near future."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe