FIFA Physics: How a Video Game Finally Figured Out Air Resistance

How a soccer video game finally got air resistance right

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When the soccer video game FIFA 14 went on sale this past fall, it boasted a ball that, at long last, could sail smartly through the air. In earlier versions of the popular game, the ball sometimes became a bit “floaty,” soaring along an unrealistically linear path.

Last year a team of engineers and animators vowed to get to the bottom of the problem. After an intense audit of all the projectile physics code in the game, they found the problem: their drag coefficient was wrong.

Engineers use the drag coefficient to model air resistance, which affects the speed and trajectory of an object in flight. “The ball moves at its fastest velocity when it comes right off the foot, and air resistance immediately slows it down until it reaches its maximum height,” says John Eric Goff, a physicist at Lynchburg College and author of Gold Medal Physics: The Science of Sports. “The ball should then pick up speed on its way down.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In previous FIFA versions the ball violated the laws of physics, accelerating and decelerating at a set rate unaffected by its initial velocity. “So if the ball was moving at 30 or 50 miles per hour, it was going to slow at the same rate as if it were moving at five miles per hour,” says Aaron McHardy, a senior gameplay producer at EA Sports, the company that produces the FIFA franchise.

The drag glitch also made for unrealistic spin. As a spinning ball whips air off to one side, the so-called Magnus effect pushes the ball in the opposite direction. A miscalculated Magnus effect meant the ball was not curving with much variability. “Once fixed, the ball would spin appropriately, and we got so much more variety in the curve,” McHardy says. “The ball now finally dips and swerves and does all these things that we see in the real world.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “FIFA Physics” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-19

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe