Filling Teeth with Tin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

MESSRS. EDITORS—In No. 21, this Vol., SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, my attention was specially attracted by the article headed " Tin versus Gold for leeth," in which testimony in favor of the former over gold was adduced. To this I also wish to add my testimony. In 1839 I had my teeth examined by a good dentist, who filled all the cavities (fifteen), with but one exception, with gold. This exceptional tooth was filled with tin, and was considered so much decayed that the use of gold was held to be extravagant, hence the employment of tin foil for the purpose. One of the teeth then filled with gold is now entirely gone, and several others have had their filling renewed, but the one filled with tin is as good as it was on the day the operation was performed. I am satisfied, both in regard to the durability and comfort experienced, by the use of tin, as a substitute for gold in filling teeth. I do not express an opinion as to the cause ; I merely relate my own experience. Tin is, undoubtedly, a superior non-conductor to gold, and perhaps its expansion by slight oxydation may tend to render it more durable, and at the same time fit more accurately in the cavity. D. S. HOWARD. Corpus Christi, Tex., April, 1858.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American