New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Finding the Connection

People who experience sensory cross talk shed light on brain wiring

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many people dream in color. Some also read and hear in color. In people with synesthesia, different senses blend in a variety of ways—one person might see the numeral four as bright yellow, and another might taste cucumbers when she hears words beginning with the letter “F.” And because synesthetes are aware of connections among parts of the brain that to most people seem distinct, they may help scientists map the mind's higher cognitive functions.

Julia Simner, a linguistic psychologist at the University of Edinburgh, is among a new crop of researchers exploring how conceptual thinking (not simply physical stimuli) may evoke colors and flavors in synesthetes. By inducing a “tip of the tongue” state—in which a known expression eludes immediate recall—in synesthetes who taste words, Simner discovered that the meanings of words can produce the same flavors as their sound or written shape. For instance, trying to remember the term “castanet” caused one woman to taste tuna, the same flavor triggered when she heard the word. Through this type of “word tasting,” Simner is exploring the potential relation between conceptual thought and perceptual experience.

People with a different type of synesthesia, who feel a sensation on their own body when they observe somebody else being touched, may provide insight into the genesis of emotions. A University College London study found that these mirror-touch synesthetes showed higher capacities for emotional empathy than others did. They may, for example, experience stronger gut reactions when they see someone in distress. When trying to rationally imagine how other people feel, however, the synesthetes scored similarly to everyone else—which suggests that more than one path through the brain ends in empathy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many unidentified synesthetes assume their perception of the world is ordinary. When the study about mirror-touch synesthesia made the news, many people were surprised to discover that experiencing this type of disembodied contact is considered unusual. Scientists believe that about 4 percent of the population experiences some form of synesthe sia and that the phenomenon probably stems from normal cognitive development in the womb and early childhood. As the brain grows, a large number of neural connections are formed. Many of these synapses are then pruned away as processes in the brain differentiate. Synesthesia may arise from an incomplete shedding of these connections.

Everyone may possess these same pathways in the brain to some degree, but most people do not realize it. Simner sees synesthetes as decoders because “they experience the relationship to conscious awareness.”

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Finding the Connection” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 5 (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1007-15b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe