Fine-Tuning Filters with Light

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: RANDY MONTOYA

Among engineers who make nanoscale membranes, the holy grail is air separation; its main ingredients, oxygen and nitrogen, are only 0.02 nanometer different in size. "People would love a filter that could separate oxygen from nitrogen," says Jeff Brinker, a senior scientist at Sandia National Laboratories and professor at the University of New Mexico. "Industrialists have invested hundreds of millions of dollars to do that." Lucky for Brinker, it looks like he's come up with the membrane that will let them do that. His latest results¿a follow-up on four earlier papers published by Brinker's group in Nature¿appear in the October 6th issue of Science.

Brinker and his colleagues have created what is, in effect, a tunable filter: a self-assembled thin-film silica with pores, arranged in a honeycomb-like structure, that change size when exposed to ultraviolet light. The material's seeming magic comes from photoacid molecules, which ordinarily self-assemble and snap into a uniform, nanoscale structure. When exposed to light, though, they break apart and form an acid that solidifies the silica nearby. More light means more acid, more solidification and smaller pore sizes. "Using light to change pore size is a kind of nanostructural engineering," Brinker says. "In addition to creating an overall pattern as achieved by conventional lithography, this kind of lithography also can help us define the internal structure of the films on the nanoscale. Even though the overal shapes we create are at the high end of the nanostructure regime, the light influences pore size and connectivity in the heart of nanoland."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe