First-Class Battleship “Connecticut”—Class of Six Ships

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Following the “Georgia” class came the authorization in 1902 of the “Connecticut” and “Louisiana,” and in the following two years of the “Kansas,” “Minnesota,” “Vermont,” and “New Hampshire.” In the same year also were authorized two battleships, the “Idaho” and “Mississippi,” of less size, power, and speed, of which we shall speak later. The first six vessels form, like the ships of the “Georgia” class, a homogeneous squadron. The “Connecticut,” built at the Brooklyn navy yard, and the “Louisiana,” built at Newport News, are practically identical. The “Kansas” and “New Hampshire,” built by the New York Shipbuilding Company; the “Minnesota,” built at Newport News; and the “Vermont,” built by the Fore River Shipbuilding Company, differ slightly in armor and other details from the two earlier ships. In the “Connecticut,” as compared with the “Georgia,” the length was increased by 15 feet, the beam by 7% inches, and the draft by 9 inches, the displacement being raised from 14,948 tons to 16,000 tons. The armor plan remained practically the same, except that the protection to the lower deck and casemates was increased to 7 inches. The battery, however, is greatly increased in power, the latest pattern of 45- caliber 12-inch gun being mounted in these ships for the first time in our navy. In addition to four of these carried axially in barbette turrets forward and aft, there are eight 45-caliber 8-inch guns in turrets on the broadside, and an exceedingly powerful secondary battery mounted in casemates on the gun deck, consisting of twelve 7-inch 50-caliber rapid-fire guns. The 7-inch gun is a new gun, and it was mounted for the first time in the “Connecticut” and “Louisiana.” It is a 50-caliber piece, capable of penetrating 6.4 inches of Krupp armor at 3,000 yards. The fire in any direction from these ships is heavy, consisting of two 12's, four 8's, and two 7's ahead and astern, and four 12's, four 8's, and six 7's on the broadside. They are provided with four submerged torpedo tubes for the new turbine torpedo, and they have the large coal supply of 2,200 tons. Both the “Connecticut” and “Louisiana” exceeded their high contract speed of 18 knots with (Continued on page #9.) Displacement, 16,00 tons. Speed, 18.5 knots. Coal Supply, 2,20 tons. Armor: Belt, 12 inches ; casemate side armor, 10 to 8 inches; barbettes and turrets, 10 to 12 inches. AriuaiuentI Eight 45-caliber 12-inch guns; twenty-two 3-inch guns. Torpedo Tubes, 2 submw. 2t-Inch. FIRST-CLASS BATTLESHIP “SOUTH CAROLINA/' ALSO “MICHIGAN."' © 1907 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC

Scientific American Magazine Vol 97 Issue 23This article was published with the title “First-Class Battleship “Connecticut”—Class of Six Ships” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 97 No. 23 (), p. 409
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12071907-409b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe