New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

First Complete Trans-Atlantic Robotic Surgery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first complete surgery performed by doctors on one continent controlling robotic instruments on another has gone off without a hitch. Surgeons in New York removed a 68-year-old woman¿s gall-bladder as she lay across the ocean in Strasbourg, France¿more than 7,000 kilometers away. Remotely-controlled robots had assisted in some trans-atlantic operations before now and doctors had consulted on procedures from a distance, but the time lag imposed by existing telecommunications technology was considered too great to make full telesurgery feasible over long ranges.

As will be described in an upcoming issue of Nature, surgeons from the European Institute of Telesurgery in Strasbourg working here in the U.S. manipulated the distant machine via a high-speed fiberoptic connection, observing its responses to their hand motions just 155 milliseconds later on a video screen. Practice operations on pigs had determined that any delay longer than 330 milliseconds would prove too risky. The operation took just under an hour, and surgeons in France stood ready to take over at the first sign of trouble. The patient went home two days later with no complications.

This kind of robot is best suited to perform minimally invasive procedures, in which a thin tube equipped with a camera and surgical instruments is inserted into a patient, giving surgeons increased control in addition to the ability to operate from afar. This success opens the door for skilled doctors to lay mechanical hands on patients in places that are hard to reach or lack personnel with the right expertise. But limitations remain; someone has to be able to set up the equipment, and the robot itself remains rather pricey.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe