First Direct Measurement of Solitary Star's Mass Since the Sun

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Our sun is perhaps the most famous and well-studied star, but now it has to share the distinction of having had its mass measured directly. Thanks to a unique astronomical event, scientists succeeded in measuring the mass of another single star nearly 2,000 light-years from Earth. ¿It's possible that by getting these kinds of measurements, we will be able to test our theories of stellar structure,¿ team leader Andrew Gould of Ohio State University says.

The mass of stars that reside in binary systems is relatively easy to assess. For singular stars such as our sun, however, the situation is much trickier. In 1993 the fortuitous alignment of two singular stars of similar brightness, when one transited in front of the other, allowed astronomers to collect key information for determining the mass of the foreground star. The event, known as MACHO-LMC-5, caused the light from the farther star to be magnified by the gravity of the second. By employing the Hubble Space Telescope's powerful Advanced Camera for Surveys, the team observed the two stars separately, which was impossible using ground-based telescopes, and collected enough data to determine the mass of the closer star.

The researchers report in a paper to be published in the Astrophysical Journal that the red star is 1,800 light-years away and one tenth the mass of the sun. Gravitational lensing events that provide sufficient information for measuring the masses of singular stars are rare--only a few occur each decade. Astronomers hope that the planned Space Interferometry Mission (SIM), scheduled for launch in 2009, will allow more singular stars to weigh in.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American